[Stones] Stonehenge Decoded?

[ewc]

Ric

<<yea>>

It seems you are not familiar with Hebridean archaeology. It is unnecessary to raise matters such as Catal Huyuk to demonstrate the possibility of intramural burials - since we have lots of examples of (contemporaneous) intramural burials (of animals and animal parts) in the Iron Age in the Uists themselves. It is entirely conceivable that humans remains could have been buried under houses there in the Bronze Age. That is really not the point at issue here. 

Given the disappointing style of your response however, I am disinclined to discussing the matter further

rob

  From: Ric 
  To: The Stones Mailing List 
  Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 12:17 AM
  Subject: Re: [Stones] Stonehenge Decoded?


        --- On Wed, 4/6/08, ewc <ewc at onetel.net> wrote:

B) the house was accidentally built on an old graveyard.

B seems to me rather more likely ... to say the very least. And 
the 'proof' (!) offered that things were otherwise seems to me......
rather 
slender...surely our expectation of adequate standards of 
objectivity from professors is one of the foundation stones of the open 
society that we have come to value and enjoy?


yeahttp://tinyurl.com/3tcexa


 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Sent from Yahoo! Mail. 
  A Smarter Email. 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Stones mailing list
  Stones at stoneslist.org.uk
  http://www.stoneslist.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/stones
  FAQ available from http://www.stoneslist.org.uk
  If you are experiencing problems with this mailing list please address mail to stones-owner at stoneslist.org.uk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.stoneslist.org.uk/pipermail/stones/attachments/20080605/e839e88b/attachment.html