[Stones] Tan Hill and cattle

Ric megalith6 at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Sep 6 00:39:09 BST 2007


aye,

straight lines which interest me are generally solar
alignments ...

lines of sight also, like the views of Silbury from
Tan Hill, because we know those views are also
basically what was known 4000 years ago, apart from
more in the way of woodland (restricting views)

R



--- littlestone <littlestone at supanet.com> wrote:

> ...straight line thro Silbury/Silbaby/ Sanctuary...
> 
> No disrespect, but I'm not convinced that three
> points in alignment (Silbury/Great Bank/Sanctuary)
> amount to much. Give me four points and I'll get out
> m' car. Give me five points that line up (say within
> a five mile 'sacred landscape' radius) and there's
> no argument. Sorry, but I'm very sceptical of lines
> through points of interest. Anyone drawn a line  for
> example from the Swallohead, through Silbury to see
> what megalith it might hit at Avebury or the Avenue?
> 'tother thing to remember is the time difference
> between the construction of the Sanctuary, the Great
> Bank (assuming the Great Bank was constructed) and
> Silbury. So what if these three points line up;
> question is what are they lining up to? Three points
> of interest in a line are meaningless - they only
> become meaningful when there are points of interest
> outside that line.> 


More information about the Stones mailing list