[Stones] So, is this what some think of our heritage?

Ric megalith6 at yahoo.co.uk
Sun Jun 17 19:03:48 BST 2007


oh dear, i fear some rather thorny posts form our
resident architects? [lol]

in terms of action, i think some thoughtfully penned
articles to the local media / press, initially in the
North Wiltshire region, perhaps underscored with some
token 'visits' to the monument

small scale but considered stuff

i seem to recall the restoration of Avebury began with
'angry letters to the Times', sort of thing?

;)

Ric

 
--- littlestone <littlestone at supanet.com> wrote:

> Ric wrote:
> 
> "architecture is art - stone circles are
> architecture - equally, they are art..."
> 
> With the greatest respect Ric, architecture is not
> art. Architecture is something conceived or made by
> a master builder (archi- chief + tekton builder). In
> that sense Avebury and Stonehenge may certainly be
> regarded as architecture. The concept behind the
> word 'art' is something quite different - in fact
> the word wasn't even applied to painting, sculpture
> etc in Europe until the end of the 17th beginning of
> the 18th century.
> 
> I completely agree with the rest of your post
> however. What sort of 'action' do you have in mind 
;-)


More information about the Stones mailing list