[Stones] Berwick St James

[jtg]

Yup, send it/them back to where they might have come from.. then send
everything back to.

 

 

Who says pre/history stops at some particular point?

 

We've been fighting this sort of cultural vandalism for a bit over here
concerning the "expunging" of the Jerries

 

The time-line I live on seems to keep moving forwards (my perception). Been
there, don't want to go back, ta.

John Germain

Jersey
British Channel Islands 

  _____  

From: stones-bounces at henge.org.uk [mailto:stones-bounces at henge.org.uk] On
Behalf Of littlestone
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 8:14 AM
To: Stones at henge.org.uk
Subject: [Stones] Berwick St James

 

Nigel wrote -

 

For me, the main issue would be - could they be confidently put back in the
position they were, NOT in antiquity but five minutes before they were
removed? If not, maybe they should just be laid on the ground 100 yards from
the monument? Better that than in the new visitors centre!

 

Yes, that had also occurred to me. I completely agree that if stones do turn
out to be from Stonehenge their final resting place should be in a protected
area and as close to the monument as possible.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.stoneslist.org.uk/pipermail/stones/attachments/20070225/f77e4eeb/attachment.html