The Stones Mailing List Thread Archive

• Date Index

• Re: [stones] Silbury alternative theory, Andy Norfolk
• Re: [stones] WKLB alternative theory, Andy Norfolk
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [stones] WKLB alternative theory, Cerridwen Connelly
  • Re: [stones] WKLB alternative theory, Cerridwen Connelly
  • [stones] WKLB alternative theory, littlestone
• [stones] Silbury, littlestone
• Re: [stones-chat]American enclosure, Andy Burnham
  • Re: [stones-chat]American enclosure, Cerridwen Connelly
• Re: [stones] More megarak type interest at PF conf next Saturday, Michael Pearce
• Re: [stones-chat]Big British Enclosures!, Andy Sweet - Megalithic sites of Perthshire
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Re: [stones-chat]Big British Enclosures!, David Raven
• [stones] UV/PS, littlestone
  • RE: [stones] UV/PS, cerris
  • RE: [stones] UV/PS, Chris Tolley
  • Re: [stones] UV/PS, Andy Norfolk
• [stones] Moonlight, littlestone
  • Re: [stones] Moonlight, Charles Tait
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [stones] Moonlight, Martin Howe
• [stones] New Stones discovered at Avebury, Paul
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [stones] New Stones discovered at Avebury, littlestone
    • Re: [stones] New Stones discovered at Avebury, Charles Tait
• [stones] Workers unearth ancient chariot, Tim and Helen
• The 7th Meet! ***OFF***, Tim and Helen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: The 7th Meet! ***OFF***, Mark White
• Derbys meets can now happen on Saturdays too!, Tim and Helen
  • Re: Derbys meets can now happen on Saturdays too!, Peter Herring
  • Re: Derbys meets can now happen on Saturdays too!, R L Pederick
  • Message not available
    • Shame! Nice Day!, Tim and Helen
• [stones] Two new footpaths, littlestone
  • [stones] Winter Solstice, Cerridwen Connelly
  • Re: [stones] Two new footpaths/Andy Norfolk, Slate Dragon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [stones] Two new footpaths, littlestone
    • Re: [stones] Two new footpaths, Cerridwen Connelly
    • Re: [stones] Two new footpaths, Slate Dragon
  • [stones] Two new footpaths, littlestone
• Re: [stones] off topic, dodger
  • Re: [stones] off topic, Irene Hallyburton
• Irish Temple at Hill of Tara, Cerridwen Connelly
• [stones] glacial movement of stones, Andy Sweet - Megalithic sites of Perthshire
  • Re: [stones] glacial movement of stones, Peter Herring
  • Re: [stones] glacial movement of stones, Paul
    • Re: [stones] glacial movement of stones, Peter Herring
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [stones] glacial movement of stones, Barry Teague
  • [stones] Glacial movement of stones, littlestone
    • Re: [stones] Glacial movement of stones, Peter Herring
  • Re: [stones] Glacial movement of stones, Barry Teague
    • Re: [stones] Glacial movement of stones, Paul
• Re: [stones] glacial movement of stones - henges, Barry Teague
  • Re: [stones] glacial movement of stones - henges, Peter Herring
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [stones] glacial movement of stones - henges, Barry Teague
    • Re: [stones] glacial movement of stones - henges, Peter Herring
      • [stones] definitions Re: [stones] glacial movement of stones - henges, J Blain
      • Re: [stones] definitions Re: [stones] glacial movement of stones - henges, Peter Herring
      • Re: [stones] definitions Re: [stones] glacial movement of stones - henges, Paul
      • Re: [stones] definitions Re: [stones] glacial movement of stones - henges, Peter Herring
      • Re: [stones] definitions Re: [stones] glacial movement of stones - henges, J Blain
      • Re: [stones] definitions Re: [stones] glacial movement of stones - henges, Peter Herring
  • Re: [stones] glacial movement of stones - henges, Barry Teague
    • Re: [stones] glacial movement of stones - henges, Peter Herring
  • Re: [stones] glacial movement of stones - henges, Barry Teague
    • Re: [stones] glacial movement of stones - henges, Peter Herring
    • Re: [stones] glacial movement of stones - henges, Andy Norfolk
• [stones] Henge, littlestone
  • Re: [stones] Henge, Peter Herring
  • Re: [stones] Henge, Chris Tweed
    • [stones] Re[2]: [stones] Henge, Chris Tweed
      • Re: [stones] Re[2]: [stones] Henge, Pat O'Halloran
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [stones] Henge, littlestone
    • Re: [stones] Henge, Peter Herring
  • [stones] Henge, littlestone
    • Re: [stones] Henge, Cerridwen Connelly
  • [stones] Henge, littlestone
  • [stones] Henge, littlestone
    • Re: [stones] Henge, Andy Norfolk
  • RE: [stones] Henge, Barry Teague
    • Re: [stones] Henge, Charles Tait
      • Re: [stones] Henge, Andy Norfolk
      • Re: [stones] Henge, Charles Tait
  • RE: [stones] Henge, Mark White
    • Re: [stones] Henge, Peter Herring
      • Re: [stones] Henge, Charles Tait
  • RE: [stones] Henge, Tom Goskar
  • [stones] Henge, littlestone
    • Re: [stones] Henge, Andy Norfolk
      • Re: [stones] Henges and piles of stones, Charles Tait
      • Re: [stones] Henges and piles of stones, Peter Herring
  • Re: [stones] Henge, Elvis Preseli
  • Re: [stones] Henge, Mark White
• [stones] Broad Stone , Inverness, Martin Howe
  • Re: [stones] Broad Stone , Inverness, Martin McCarthy
  • Re: [stones] Broad Stone , Inverness, Tim and Helen
• [stones] Land Acces in Devon - Vixen Tor, Tim and Helen
• Re: Shame, nice day!, David Raven
  • Re: Shame, nice day!, Tim and Helen
• [stones] Bluestone Project Decision Due, Tim and Helen
• Uffington horse T-shirts, Andy Sweet - Megalithic sites of Perthshire
• archaeological illustration, Andy Sweet - Megalithic sites of Perthshire
  • Re: archaeological illustration, Charles Tait
    • Re: archaeological illustration, Charles Tait
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: archaeological illustration, Tom Goskar
• [stones] I think that Supanet's mail host is trying to tell us something..., Chris Tweed
  • Re: [stones] I think that Supanet's mail host is trying to tell us something..., Andy Burnham
• Re: [stones] Henges and piles of stones, Paul Wallis
• [stones] Bland Bettany, Peter Herring
• RE: [stones] Bland Bettany (but nice hair!), Elvis Preseli
  • [stones] Sunset and Sunrise, Jane @ GrayUk
    • Re: [stones] Sunset and Sunrise, J Blain
    • Re: [stones] Sunset and Sunrise, Charles Tait
    • Re: [stones] Sunset and Sunrise, Tim and Helen
      • Re: [stones] Sunset and Sunrise, Jane @ GrayUk
  • [stones] Blaand, Charles Tait
• RE: [stones] Blaand, Paul Wallis
• RE: [stones] Sunset and Sunrise, Paul Wallis
• RE: [stones] Blaand / Koumiss, Tom Goskar
• [stones] Henge and Megaliths, littlestone
  • Re: [stones] Henge and Megaliths, Alan S
    • Re: [stones] Henge and Megaliths, Andy Burnham
• [stones] Buried megalihs, littlestone
• [stones] History is Boring, especially prehistory!, Tim and Helen
  • Re: [stones] History is Boring, especially prehistory!, Irene Hallyburton
  • Re: [stones] History is Boring, especially prehistory!, Peter Herring
  • Re: [stones] History is Boring, especially prehistory!, Andy Sweet - Megalithic sites of Perthshire
  • Re: [stones] History is Boring, especially prehistory!, Paul
    • Re: [stones] History is Boring, especially prehistory!, Cerridwen Connelly
      • RE: [stones] History is Boring, especially prehistory!, Louise
      • Re: [stones] History is Boring, especially prehistory!, Cerridwen Connelly
  • Re: [stones] History is Boring, especially prehistory!, Andy Burnham
    • Re: [stones] History is Boring, especially prehistory!, Tim and Helen
      • Re: [stones] History is Boring, especially prehistory!, lorainne stobbart
      • Re: [stones] T-Shirt Offer - was History is Boring, especially prehistory!, Andy Burnham
  • Re: [stones] History is Boring, especially prehistory!, Jane @ GrayUk
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Re: [stones] History is Boring, especially prehistory!, David Raven
    • Re: Re: [stones] History is Boring, especially prehistory!, belshade
  • Re: [stones] History is Boring, especially prehistory!, David Raven
  • Re: [stones] History is Boring, especially prehistory!, Paul Wallis
• Some controversial archaeoastronomy from Colorado, Andy Burnham
  • Re: Some controversial archaeoastronomy from Colorado, Pat O'Halloran
• [stones] Couple find Iron Age coin hoard, Tim and Helen
• [stones] Road Trip, Parker, Jeremy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [stones] Road Trip, Paul Wallis
  • RE: [stones] Road Trip, Parker, Jeremy
• [stones] American site, Peter Herring
  • Re: [stones] American site, Peter Herring
    • Re: [stones] American site, george currie
      • Re: [stones] American site, Tim and Helen
      • Re: [stones] American site, Peter Herring
  • Re: [stones] American site, Michael Pearce
    • Re: [stones] American site, Andy Sweet - Megalithic sites of Perthshire
  • Re: [stones] American site, wolf thandoy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [stones] American site, Gerald Ponting
    • Re: [stones] American site, Peter Herring
      • Re: [stones] American site, Andy Burnham
      • Re: [stones] American site, wolf thandoy
      • Re: [stones] American site, Peter Herring
• [stones] Quarry company agrees to move, Tim and Helen
• [stones] Stonehenge/NT documentary, Paul
  • Re: [stones] Stonehenge/NT documentary, J Blain
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [stones] Stonehenge/NT documentary, littlestone
    • Re: [stones] Stonehenge/NT documentary, Paul
      • Re: [stones] Stonehenge/NT documentary, Tim and Helen
      • Re: [stones] Stonehenge/NT documentary, Cerridwen Connelly
      • Re: [stones] Stonehenge/NT documentary, Andy Burnham
      • Re: [stones] Stonehenge/NT documentary, American Sites - Introduction, Charles
  • [stones] Stonehenge/NT documentary, littlestone
    • Re: [stones] Stonehenge/NT documentary, Paul
      • Re: [stones] Stonehenge/NT documentary, george@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • [stones] Stonehenge/NT documentary, littlestone
    • [stones] digital broadcast videoing problems, Andy Burnham
  • [stones] Stonehenge/NT documentary, littlestone
• [stones] Laurence Main's walks, David Raven
• [stones] stoenhenge enquiry, cursus2
• [stones] thornborough henges, cursus2
  • [stones] Intro - Part 2, Charles
    • Re: [stones] Intro - Part 2, h.jezreell
• Address Check, Stones Mailing List
• [stones] not a stone stood standing, littlestone
  • Re: [stones] not a stone stood standing, leslie.ceridwen
  • Re: [stones] not a stone stood standing, Chris Tweed
  • Re: [stones] not a stone stood standing, Andy Norfolk
• [stones], Helen
• Stonehenge assessment of sacred impacts, Andy Norfolk
  • Re: Stonehenge assessment of sacred impacts, Peter Herring
    • Re: Stonehenge assessment of sacred impacts, Andy Norfolk
      • Re: Stonehenge assessment of sacred impacts, Peter Herring
  • Re: Stonehenge assessment of sacred impacts, Cerridwen Connelly
    • Re: Stonehenge assessment of sacred impacts, Andy Norfolk
• [stones] buried at Avebury..., mym
  • Re: [stones] buried at Avebury..., Peter Herring
    • Re: [stones] buried at Avebury..., Mark Ynys-Mon
• Happy Winter Solstice!, Cerridwen Connelly
• [stones] Three million and still going, Paul
• Re: [stones] Stonehenge/NT documentary - an amazing gift, Infinitpossblity
• [stones] Nine Ladies quarries - application submitted, Paul
• [stones]markymail, Mark White
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [stones]markymail, Mark White
    • Re: [stones]markymail, Tim and Helen
  • Re: [stones]markymail, Mark White
• [stones]Portal, Pat O'Halloran
  • Re: [stones] Portal - here too, Tim and Helen
  • Re: [stones]Portal, Andy Burnham
    • Re: [stones]Temporary backup Portal, Andy Burnham
      • Re: [stones]Temporary backup Portal, J Blain
• [stones]oops, J Blain
• [stones]Public consulation into Peak quarrying, Tim and Helen
• Megalithic Portal Update, 2000 deep links added + big link opportunity for webmasters, Andy Burnham
• [stones]Egypt Programme, Tim and Helen
  • Re: [stones]Egypt Programme, Charles
• [stones]3rd Stone article, Andy Norfolk
  • Re: [stones]Fortean article, The Wissers
    • Re: [stones]Fortean article, Tim and Helen
      • Re: [stones]Fortean article, wolf thandoy
    • [stones]Re(2): [stones]Fortean article, Pat O'Halloran
• Re: Re: [stones]Fortean article, David Raven
  • Re: Re: [stones]Fortean article, J Blain
    • Re: Re: [stones]Fortean article, Andy Norfolk
      • Re: Re: [stones]Fortean article, J Blain
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Re: Re: [stones]Fortean article, David Raven
    • Re: Re: Re: [stones]Fortean article, J Blain
• [stones]Egyptian top 10, David Swindlehurst
  • Re: [stones]Egyptian top 10, h.jezreell
• [stones]Major standstill and summer solstice, Phyllis Goodall
• [stones]Was Avebury Bank & Ditch an artificial horizon used in an accurate celestial clock?, lynn DARNTON
  • Re: [stones]Was Avebury Bank & Ditch an artificial horizon used in an accurate celestial clock?, Andy Norfolk
  • Re: Avebury Bank & Ditch, Andy Burnham
  • Re: [stones]Was Avebury Bank & Ditch an artificial horizon used in an accurate celestial clock?, h.jezreell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [stones]Was Avebury Bank & Ditch an artificial horizon used in an accurate celestial clock?, Andy Norfolk
• Excellent new Jersey site, Andy Burnham
• Re: Re: Avebury Bank & Ditch, cursus2
  • Re: Re: Avebury Bank & Ditch, Mark Ynys-Mon
  • Re: Avebury Bank & Ditch, Phyllis Goodall