The Stones Mailing List Thread Archive

• Date Index

• ADMIN: Testing new list, Alligator Descartes
  • Re: ADMIN: Testing new list, Chris Tweed
• FROM ADMIN - Mailing List Has Moved, Chris Tweed
• another test, Chris Tweed
  • Re: another test, Charles Tait
• A note regarding the subject line issued by the mailing list, Chris Tweed
• ADMIN: Testing Redirection, Alligator Descartes
• ADMIN: Testing Redirection #2, Alligator Descartes
• Re: [stones] Time Team tonight, J Blain
  • Re: [stones] Time Team tonight, Alligator Descartes
    • Re: [stones] Time Team tonight, J Blain
• New mail test from non-admin-type punter - please ignore, Wally
• [stones]testing tagging of subject lines, Chris Tweed
  • Re: [stones]testing tagging of subject lines, Chris Tweed
• [stones] New Stones Mailing List Details, Chris Tweed
• [stones] Why the move?, Chris Tweed
  • Re: [stones] Why the move?, Victor Reijs
• [stones] FW: [earthmysteries] ?Second Seahenge? faces oblivion, Andy Burnham
  • [stones] Re: [stones] FW: [earthmysteries] ?Second Seahenge? faces oblivion, Alligator Descartes
• [stones] ADMIN: Stones mailing list aliases, Alligator Descartes
  • RE: [stones] ADMIN: Stones mailing list aliases, Andy Burnham
• Re: [stones] Re: Ritual, Replication and Cruithni, Alligator Descartes
  • Re: [stones] Re: Ritual, Replication and Cruithni, The Wissers
    • [stones] Chat now, Andy Burnham
  • Re: [stones] Re: Ritual, Replication and Cruithni, kate
    • RE: [stones] Re: Ritual, Replication and Cruithni, Wally
  • Re: [stones] Re: Ritual, Replication and Cruithni, Andy Norfolk
    • Re: [stones] Re: Ritual, Replication and Cruithni, FOGS
      • Re: [stones] Re: Ritual, Replication and Cruithni, The Wissers
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [stones] Re: Ritual, Replication and Cruithni, kate
    • Re: [stones] Re: Ritual, Replication, Cerridwen Connelly
      • Re: [stones] Re: Ritual, Replication, Alligator Descartes
      • Re: [stones] Re: Ritual, Replication, Andy Norfolk
  • Re: [stones] Re: Ritual, Replication and Cruithni, J Blain
    • Re: [stones] Re: Ritual, Replication and Cruithni, Alligator Descartes
    • Re: [stones] Re: Ritual, Replication and Cruithni, The Wissers
  • Re: [stones] Re: Ritual, Replication and Cruithni, Andy Sweet
    • Re: [stones] Re: Ritual, Replication, Cerridwen Connelly
  • Re: [stones] Re: Ritual, Replication and Cruithni, Paul Wallis
  • Re: [stones] Re: Ritual, Replication and Cruithni, Paul Wallis
  • Re: [stones] Re: Ritual, Replication and Cruithni, Phyllis J Goodall
• Re: [stones] Cup and Ring Markings, h . jezreell
• Re: [stones] Re: Language of ogham, Victor Reijs
• [stones] ASLaN and policy making, paulvicky
  • RE: [stones] ASLaN and policy making, Andy Burnham
    • [stones] pome, justin
      • RE: [stones] Cyderdelic, Andy Burnham
      • RE: [stones] Cyderdelic, riotgibbon
  • Re: [stones] ASLaN and policy making, Andy Norfolk
    • Re: [stones] ASLaN and policy making, justin
      • Re: [stones] ASLaN and policy making, J Blain
      • Re: [stones] ASLaN and policy making, justin
    • Re: [stones] ASLaN and policy making, FOGS
      • Re: [stones] ASLaN and policy making, Karin Attwood
      • Re: [stones] ASLaN and policy making, Andy Norfolk
      • [stones] Conference dates please Re: [stones] ASLaN and policy making, J Blain
      • Re: [stones] ASLaN and policy making, Alligator Descartes
  • Re: [stones] ASLaN and policy making, Wally
  • Re: ASLaN and policy making, FOGS
    • [stones] Grampian issues Re: ASLaN and policy making, J Blain
      • Re: Grampian issues Re: ASLaN and policy making, FOGS
• Re: [stones] Aubrey Burl Yale books/Carnac, noka _
• [stones], nancy wisser
• RE: [stones] Cyderdelic, Mark White
• [stones] longmeg and the moonflowers, justin
  • Re: [stones] longmeg and the moonflowers, Pat O'Halloran
    • Re: [stones] longmeg and the moonflowers, justin
  • [stones] Moonflowers & Winter Solstice pix, riotgibbon
    • RE: [stones] Moonflowers & Winter Solstice pix, Andy Burnham
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [stones] longmeg and the moonflowers, noka _
    • Re: [stones] longmeg and the moonflowers, Justin Grammer
  • Re: [stones] longmeg and the moonflowers, noka _
• [stones] Fw: [stones] ASLaN and policy making, Karin Attwood
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [stones] Fw: [stones] ASLaN and policy making, Karin Attwood
    • Re: [stones] Fw: [stones] ASLaN and policy making, Wally
      • Re: [stones] Fw: [stones] ASLaN and policy making, Karin Attwood
• [stones] That Freeserve ad, Mark White
• [stones] ASLAN, Valerie Bannister
  • Re: [stones] ASLAN, Karin Attwood
    • Re: [stones] ASLAN, Wally
      • Re: [stones] ASLAN, Andy Norfolk
      • Re: [stones] ASLAN, Wally
      • Re: [stones] ASLAN, Andy Norfolk
      • Re: [stones] ASLAN, Wally
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [stones] ASLaN, Valerie Bannister
• [stones] Are Pyramids Made Out of Concrete?, Shaun
  • Re: [stones] Are Pyramids Made Out of Concrete?, The Wissers
• [stones] stones Mailing List Mailing List Interface, Shaun
  • Re: [stones] stones Mailing List Mailing List Interface, Alligator Descartes
    • Re: [stones] stones Mailing List Mailing List Interface, Jezreell
      • Re: [stones] stones Mailing List Mailing List Interface, Alligator Descartes
      • Re: [stones] stones Mailing List Mailing List Interface, Jezreell
      • [stones] Archive issues, Chris Tweed
      • Re: [stones] Archive issues, Jezreell
      • Re: [stones] Archive issues, Tim and Helen
    • Re: [stones] stones Mailing List Mailing List Interface, Shaun
      • Re: [stones] stones Mailing List Mailing List Interface, Alligator Descartes
      • RE: [stones] stones Mailing List Mailing List Interface, Andy Burnham
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [stones] stones Mailing List Mailing List Interface, Luvluvver
• [stones] Anti ASLaN claims, Andy Norfolk
  • Re: [stones] Anti ASLaN claims, Valerie Bannister
• [stones] Jezreell's reconnected... but, Jezreell
• [stones] Huly Hill damage page has moved, Wally
• [stones] FW: Stonehenge threat, Andy Burnham
  • Re: [stones] FW: Stonehenge threat, Andy Norfolk
  • Re: [stones] FW: Stonehenge threat, Cerridwen Connelly
    • RE: [stones] FW: Stonehenge threat, Andy Burnham
• [stones] Sonehenge2002 - after party/celebration working group/collective forming, Luvluvver
  • RE: [stones] Sonehenge2002 - after party/celebration working group/collective forming, Andy Burnham
    • Re: [stones] Sonehenge2002 - after party/celebration working group/collective forming, Shaun
      • Re: [stones] Sonehenge2002 - after party/celebration working group/collective forming, Robin Pender
• Re: [stones] Sonehenge2002 - after party/celebration working group/collective..., Luvluvver
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [stones] Sonehenge2002 - after party/celebration working group/collective..., Luvluvver
    • Re: [stones] Sonehenge2002 - after party/celebration working group/collective..., Robin Pender
      • Re: [stones] Sonehenge2002 - after party/celebration working group/collective..., Wally
      • Re: [stones] Sonehenge2002 - after party/celebration working group/collective..., Wally
      • Re: [stones] Sonehenge2002 - after party/celebration working group/collective..., justin
      • RE: [stones] Sonehenge2002 - after party/celebration working group/collective..., Wally
      • Re: [stones] Sonehenge2002 - after party/celebration working group/collective..., Robert Farrah
      • Re: [stones] Sonehenge2002 - after party/celebration working group/collective..., justin
• [stones] Cup and Ring, Jezreell
• [stones] Elizabeth Shee Twohig, Shaun
  • Re: [stones] Elizabeth Shee Twohig, Jezreell
    • Re: [stones] Elizabeth Shee Twohig, Shaun
• [stones] R: [stones] FW: Stonehenge threat, Franco S.
• [stones] Who are we??..Re-run?, Shaun
  • Re: [stones] Who are we??..Re-run?, Chris Tweed
    • [stones] Re(2): [stones] Who are we??..Re-run?, Pat O'Halloran
      • Re: [stones] Re(2): [stones] Who are we??..Re-run?, Shaun
      • Re: PROFILE[stones] Re(2): [stones] Who are we??..Re-run?, Quickbeam Lineone
      • Re: PROFILE[stones] Re(2): [stones] Who are we??..Re-run?, Shaun
      • RE: [stones] Re(2): [stones] Who are we??..Re-run?, Andy Burnham
      • Re: [stones] Re(2): [stones] Who are we??..Re-run?, The Wissers
    • Re: [stones] Who are we??..Re-run?, Shaun
      • Re: [stones] Who are we??..Re-run?, Sam Fleming
      • [stones] Re[2]: [stones] Who are we??..Re-run?, Chris Tweed
    • Re: [stones] Who are we??..Re-run?, Phyllis J Goodall
      • [stones] Web chat, Andy Burnham
  • Re: [stones] Who are we??..Re-run?, Jezreell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE:[stones] Who are we??..Re-run?, longstafffamily
  • Re: [stones] Who are we??..Re-run?, MKinley845
    • Re: [stones] Who are we??..Re-run?, Frank Wayman
  • Re: [stones] Who are we??..Re-run?, Paul Wallis
• Re: Who are we?, paulvicky
• [stones] Self replying question, Toti Calò
  • Re: [stones] Self replying question, Wally
  • Re: [stones] Self replying question, Chris Tweed
• [stones] more seahenge, Penny Waterhouse
  • Re: [stones] more seahenge, Alligator Descartes
    • Re: [stones] more seahenge, Penny Waterhouse
• [stones] Stonehenge2002AfterParty, Luvluvver
• [stones] Who is me, Robert Farrah
  • Re: [stones] Who is me/Q for Robert, J Helling
    • Re: [stones] Who is me/Q for Robert, Robert Farrah
• [stones] Fw: PREHISTORY IN THE PEAK, Barry Teague
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE:[stones] Fw: PREHISTORY IN THE PEAK, paulvicky
• [stones] clarification, Luvluvver
  • Re: [stones] clarification, Shaun
  • Re: [stones] clarification, Jezreell
  • Re: [stones] clarification, Wally
  • Re: [stones] clarification, justin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [stones] clarification, MKinley845
  • Re: [stones] clarification, Luvluvver
    • Re: [stones] clarification, Wally
      • Re: [stones] clarification, Sam Fleming
    • Re: [stones] clarification, justin
  • Re: [stones] clarification, Luvluvver
  • Re: [stones] clarification, Luvluvver
    • Re: [stones] clarification, Alligator Descartes
  • Re: [stones] clarification, Luvluvver
    • Re: [stones] clarification, Shaun
    • Re: [stones] clarification, Wally
  • Re: [stones] clarification, Luvluvver
    • Re: [stones] clarification, Shaun
  • Re: [stones] clarification, Luvluvver
    • Re: [stones] clarification, J Blain
      • Re: [stones] clarification, The Wissers
      • [stones] Rollright footage Re: [stones] clarification, J Blain
      • Re: [stones] Rollright footage Re: [stones] clarification, The Wissers
      • Re: [stones] Rollright footage Re: [stones] clarification, J Blain
      • Re: [stones] Rollright footage, The Wissers
      • Re: America's Stonehenge was Rollright footage, Karin Attwood
      • Re: [stones] Rollright footage, Karin Attwood
      • Re: [stones] clarification, Wally
      • Re: [stones] clarification, Shaun
      • [stones] Rollrights / Who are we, Andy Burnham
      • Re: [stones] Rollrights / Who are we, Chris Tweed
      • Re: [stones] Rollrights / Who are we, Andy Norfolk
      • RE: [stones] Rollrights / Who are we, Andy Burnham
      • Re: [stones] clarification, Karin Attwood
• Re: Clarification, paulvicky
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:clarification, Luvluvver
    • RE: clarification, Andy Burnham
  • Re: clarification, MKinley845
  • Re: clarification, Luvluvver
  • Re: clarification, MKinley845
• [stones] Huly Hill Latest, Wally
  • Re: [stones] Huly Hill Latest, Sam Fleming
• Re: [stones] Sonehenge2002 - after party/celebration working group/collectiv..., MKinley845
  • RE: [stones] Sonehenge2002 - after party/celebration working group/collectiv..., Wally
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [stones] Sonehenge2002 - after party/celebration working group/collectiv..., MKinley845
    • RE: [stones] Sonehenge2002 - after party/celebration working group/collectiv..., Wally
• [stones] Who?, helensmellen
• [stones] Huly Hill damage, paulvicky
  • Re: [stones] Huly Hill damage, Wally
• [stones] Who are we?, Shaun
  • Re: [stones] Who are we?, Chris Tweed
    • Re: [stones] Who are we?, Robin Pender
      • Re: [stones] Who are we?, Andy Norfolk
      • [stones] sonically challenging location, Andy Burnham
      • Re: [stones] sonically challenging location, Robin Pender
    • Re: [stones] Who are we?, Shaun
      • [stones] Who are we? / Callanish talk, Gerald Ponting
      • Re: [stones] Who are we? / Callanish talk, Shaun
  • Re: [stones] Who are we?, Susan McKnight
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [stones] Who are we?, Shaun
• [stones] Don't forget us!, Marty Katz
  • Re: [stones] Don't forget us!, Robin Pender
    • Re: [stones] Profile FOGS, FOGS
      • Re: [stones] Profile FOGS, Alligator Descartes
      • [stones] Re(2): [stones] Profile FOGS, Pat O'Halloran
      • [stones] Re(2): [stones] Profile FOGS, FOGS
      • Re: [stones] Re(2): [stones] Profile FOGS, Pat O'Halloran
      • Re: [stones] Re(2): [stones] Profile FOGS, FOGS
      • Re: [stones] Re(2): [stones] Profile FOGS, Justin Grammer
      • Re: [stones] Re(2): [stones] Profile FOGS, FOGS
      • Re: [stones] Re(2): [stones] Profile FOGS, Justin Grammer
• [stones] FAQ - well, part of it anyway!, Chris Tweed
  • Re: [stones] FAQ - well, part of it anyway!, Valerie Bannister
    • Re: [stones] FAQ - well, part of it anyway!, justin
      • [stones] Re[2]: [stones] FAQ - well, part of it anyway!, Chris Tweed
• [stones] recent conduct on the list, Chris Tweed
• [stones] Who are we ?, darren . haynes
  • Re: [stones] Who are we ?, Karin Attwood
  • Re: [stones] Who are we ?, Jezreell
    • Re: [stones] Who are we ?, Jane
    • [stones] Walk, Jane
      • Re: [stones] Walk, Shaun
      • Re: [stones] Walk, Shaun
      • Re: [stones] Walk, J Blain
    • Re: [stones] Who are we ?, Kurt Jonckheere
      • Re: [stones] Who are we ?, helensmellen
      • Re: [stones] Who / Baroclodiad Key, Tim and Helen
• [stones] more Holme timber circle, Barry Teague
• [stones] FW: More timber circle stuff..., Andy Burnham
  • Re: [stones] FW: More timber circle stuff..., Penny Waterhouse
• Re: [stones] Walk, Paul Wallis
  • Re: [stones] Walk, Jezreell
    • Re: [stones] Walk, Shaun
      • Re: [stones] Walk, Jane
      • Re: [stones] Walk, Jane
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [stones] Walk, Shaun
• [stones] Changes to Rollright, Karin Attwood
  • [stones] whoops!, Karin Attwood
    • Re: [stones] whoops!, Jezreell
  • Re: [stones] Changes to Rollright, Jezreell
    • Re: [stones] Changes to Rollright, Karin Attwood
      • Re: [stones] Changes to Rollright, justin
      • Re: [stones] Changes to Rollright, Karin Attwood
      • Re: [stones] Changes to Rollright, The Wissers
      • Re: [stones] Changes to Rollright, Justin Grammer
  • Re: [stones] Changes to Rollright, Valerie Bannister
    • Re: [stones] Changes to Rollright, justin
• [stones] Rollright trees, Valerie Bannister
• [stones] Froggatt Edge Circle, Shaun
  • Re: [stones] Froggatt Edge Circle, justin
    • Re: [stones] Froggatt Edge Circle, Shaun
      • Re: [stones] Froggatt Edge Circle, justin
      • Re: [stones] Froggatt Edge Circle, Shaun
      • Re: [stones] Froggatt Edge Circle, justin
      • [stones] Cumbria stones, J Helling
      • Re: [stones] Cumbria stones, justin
      • Re: [stones] Froggatt Edge Circle, helensmellen
      • Re: [stones] Froggatt Edge Circle, David
      • [stones] was Froggatt Edge Circle, now gone pear shaped, justin
      • [stones] Stuff, Andy Burnham
  • Re: [stones] Froggatt Edge Circle, Jezreell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE:[stones] Froggatt Edge Circle, paulvicky
• [stones] BBC History Message Board, Tim and Helen
• [stones] Seahenge felling date, Jezreell
  • Re: a megalith is for life..., Rick
    • [stones] abducted megaliths, DAVID MITCHELL
      • Re: [stones] abducted megaliths, Rick
• [stones] (Was who are we) Susan.Mck - Beaghmore, MKinley845
• Re: [stones] sonically challenging location, MKinley845
  • RE: [stones] sonically challenging location, Wally
    • Re: [stones] sonically challenging location, Robin Pender
      • Re: [stones] sonically challenging location, Alligator Descartes
      • Re: [stones] sonically challenging location, Robin Pender
      • Re: [stones] sonically challenging location, Alligator Descartes
      • Re: [stones] sonically challenging location, Robin Pender
      • Re: [stones] sonically challenging location, Alligator Descartes
      • RE: [stones] sonically challenging location O/T, Wally
      • RE: [stones] sonically challenging location O/T, Alligator Descartes
      • Re: [stones] sonically challenging location O/T, Wally
      • Re: [stones] sonically challenging location O/T, Shaun
      • Re: [stones] sonically challenging location O/T, Alligator Descartes
      • Re: [stones] sonically challenging location O/T, Shaun
      • RE: [stones] sonically challenging location O/T, Andy Burnham
      • Re: [stones] sonically challenging location O/T, Jezreell
      • Re: [stones] sonically challenging location O/T, Andy Norfolk
      • Re: [stones] sonically challenging location, Wally
      • Re: [stones] sonically challenging location, Cerridwen Connelly
      • RE: [stones] sonically challenging location, Andy Burnham
      • Re: [stones] sonically challenging location O/T, Andy Norfolk
      • Re: [stones] sonically challenging location O/T, Victor Reijs
      • Re: [stones] sonically challenging location, Robin Pender
      • [stones] Acoustics, Science and Ye stonies, Alligator Descartes
      • Re: [stones] Acoustics, Science and Ye stonies, Jezreell
      • Re: [stones] Acoustics, Science and Ye stonies, The Wissers
      • Re: [stones] Acoustics, Science and Ye stonies, J Helling
      • Re: [stones] Acoustics, Science and Ye stonies, FOGS
      • Re: [stones] Acoustics, Science and Ye stonies, The Wissers
      • Re: [stones] Acoustics, Science and Ye stonies, Justin Grammer
      • Re: [stones] Acoustics, Science and Ye stonies, The Wissers
      • Re: [stones] Acoustics, Science and Ye stonies, Lawrence Moore
      • Re: [stones] Acoustics, Science and Ye stonies, The Wissers
      • RE: [stones] sonically challenging location, Andy Burnham
      • Re: [stones] sonically challenging location/Steve Hillage, Barry Teague
      • Re: [stones] sonically challenging location/Steve Hillage, Sam Fleming
      • Re: [stones] sonically challenging location/Steve Hillage, Barry Teague
      • Re: [stones] sonically challenging location/Steve Hillage, Wally
      • Re: [stones] sonically challenging location/Steve Hillage, justin
• [stones] Lords and Ladies at the Rollright Stones, Karin-Ann Attwood
• [stones] Archaeologist tired of unearthing unspeakable ancient evils, Barry Teague
  • Re: [stones] Archaeologist tired of unearthing unspeakable ancient evils, Alligator Descartes
• [stones] Fw: Lords and Ladies at the Rollright Stones, Karin Attwood
• [stones] Arbow Low & Mam Tor on telly, Tim and Helen
  • Re: [stones] Arbow Low & Mam Tor on telly, Barry Teague
• [stones] tv, The Wissers
• [stones] First Cumbrian stones meet!! :o), Shaun
  • Re: [stones] First Cumbrian stones meet!! :o), justin
    • Re: [stones] First Cumbrian stones meet!! :o), Shaun
• [stones] sonic stuff, paulvicky
  • Re: [stones] sonic stuff, Andy Sweet
    • Re: [stones] sonic stuff, Wally
• [stones] stones meet, Justin Grammer
  • Re: [stones] stones meet, helensmellen
    • Re: [stones] stones meet, Justin Grammer
      • Re: [stones] stones meet, Shaun
      • Re: [stones] stones meet, Susan McKnight
      • Re: [stones] stones meet, Shaun
      • Re: [stones] stones meet, justin
      • Re: [stones] stones meet, Shaun
      • Re: [stones] stones meet, Susan McKnight
      • Re: [stones] stones meet, Susan McKnight
      • Re: [stones] stones meet, J Helling
      • Re: [stones] stones meet, Susan McKnight
      • Re: [stones] Cumbrian stones meet, Shaun
      • Re: [stones] stones meet, Robert Farrah
  • Re: [stones] stones meet, Robert Farrah
• [stones] Guerilla war in Cornwall, Barry Teague
  • Re: [stones] Guerilla war in Cornwall, Andy Norfolk
    • Re: [stones] Guerilla war in Cornwall, justin
      • Re: [stones] Guerilla war in Cornwall, J Blain
      • Re: [stones] Guerilla war in Cornwall, Justin Grammer
      • Re: [stones] Guerilla war in Cornwall, Alan Bain
    • Re: [stones] Guerilla war in Cornwall, Jezreell
      • Re: [stones] Guerilla war in Cornwall, Andy Sweet
      • Re: [stones] Guerilla war in Cornwall, Andy Norfolk
      • Re: [stones] Guerilla war in Cornwall, Gary Crabbe
      • Re: [stones] Guerilla war in Cornwall, Jezreell
      • Re: [stones] Guerilla war / Equation, Tim and Helen
      • [stones] Carreg ateb (Echo Stone) destroyed, john
      • Re: [stones] Guerilla war in Cornwall, justin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [stones] Guerilla war in Cornwall, nick
  • Re: Re: [stones] Guerilla war in Cornwall, nick
  • Re: Re: [stones] Guerilla war in Cornwall, nick
  • Re: [stones] Guerilla war in Cornwall, MKinley845
    • Re: [stones] Guerilla war in Cornwall, Andy Norfolk
  • Re: Re: [stones] Guerilla war in Cornwall, nick
• [stones] Cumbria stones meet, paulvicky
• Re: [stones] Guerilla war in Cornwall/Kernow bys vykken, noka _
  • Re: [stones] Guerilla war in Cornwall/Kernow bys vykken, Andy Norfolk
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [stones] Guerilla war in Cornwall/Kernow bys vykken, noka _
• [stones] Jezreell's equation, Shaun
• [stones] Bridestones lecture, paulvicky
• [stones] February Derbyshire Meet, Tim and Helen
  • Re: [stones] February Derbyshire Meet, J Blain
    • Re: [stones] February Derbyshire Meet / Babrook III, Tim and Helen
      • Re: [stones] February Derbyshire Meet / Babrook III, J Blain
    • Re: [stones] February Derbyshire Meet, helensmellen
• [stones] Stones meet pub, paulvicky
  • Re: [stones] Stones meet pub, J Blain
• [stones] Carreg ateb removal, paulvicky
• [stones] Fw: Re Dates for the calendar, Jane
  • Re: [stones] Fw: Re Dates for the calendar, J Blain
• [stones] Moorland destruction stopped, paulvicky
• [stones] I'm stuck, Mark White
  • RE: [stones] I'm stuck, Wally
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [stones] I'm stuck, noka _
  • Re: [stones] I'm stuck, noka _
  • RE: [stones] I'm stuck, noka _
    • RE: [stones] I'm stuck, Wally
  • RE: [stones] I'm stuck, noka _
  • RE: [stones] I'm stuck, noka _
• [stones] Fw: Mystery trench sparks meteorite theory, Cerridwen Connelly
  • Re: [stones] Fw: Mystery trench sparks meteorite theory, rustybus
  • RE: [stones] Fw: Mystery trench sparks meteorite theory, Gerald Ponting
• [stones] Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest, Jezreell
  • Re: [stones] Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest, The Wissers
  • Re: [stones] Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest, Michael Bradley
    • Re: [stones] Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest, Andy Norfolk
      • Re: [stones] Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest, Michael Bradley
      • [stones] Esus, Alan Bain
      • Re: [stones] Esus, Michael Bradley
      • Re: [stones] Esus, Rick
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [stones] Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest, Mark White
  • Re: [stones] Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest, Twenty3Cats
  • Re: [stones] Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest, MKinley845
    • Re: [stones] Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest, Michael Bradley
      • Re: [stones] Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest, Jezreell
      • Re: [stones] Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest, Michael Bradley
      • Re: [stones] Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest, Alligator Descartes
      • Re: [stones] Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest, Michael Bradley
      • Re: [stones] Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest, Alligator Descartes
      • Re: [stones] Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest, Michael Bradley
      • Re: [stones] Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest, Alligator Descartes
      • Re: [stones] Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest, Rick
      • Re: [stones] Over here, The Wissers
      • Re: [stones] Over here, Shaun
      • Re: [stones] Over here, Jezreell
      • Re: [stones] Over here, The Wissers
      • Re: [stones] Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest, Alligator Descartes
      • Re: [stones] Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest, Jezreell
      • Re: [stones] Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest, Michael Bradley
      • Re: [stones] Sinclairs again, Jezreell
      • Re: [stones] Sinclairs again, Michael Bradley
      • [stones] moon & star conjunction, Dingo
      • RE: [stones] moon & star conjunction, Sigurd Towrie
      • Re: [stones] moon & star conjunction, Alligator Descartes
      • RE: [stones] moon & star conjunction, Dingo
      • RE: [stones] moon & star conjunction, Alligator Descartes
      • RE: [stones] moon & star conjunction, FOGS
      • RE: [stones] moon & star conjunction, Alligator Descartes
      • Re: [stones] Sunday over here, The Wissers
      • [stones] Lenape rock art, Penny Waterhouse
      • Re: [stones] Lenape rock art, The Wissers
      • Re: [stones] Lenape rock art, The Wissers
      • [stones] Devil's Quoits visit, riotgibbon
      • [stones] Devil's Quoits visit, riotgibbon
      • Re: [stones] moon & star conjunction, Pat O'Halloran
      • RE: [stones] increasingly inaccurately titled : moon & star conjunction, Dingo
  • Re: [stones] Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest, Twenty3Cats
    • Re: [stones] Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest, Rick
  • Re: [stones] Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest, Twenty3Cats
• [stones] FW:Stonehenge roads meeting, Barry Teague
• [stones] FW:Seahenge update, Barry Teague
  • RE: [stones] FW:Seahenge update & 'process theory', Dingo
  • Re: [stones] FW:Seahenge update, Rick
• [stones] More Peak Quarry News, paulvicky
• [stones] Lurker on Marija Gimbutas, isishazel
  • Re: Marija Gimbutas, DAVID MITCHELL
• Re: [stones] sonically challenging location O/T, Twenty3Cats
• [stones] Who is Michael Bradley......., Twenty3Cats
• [stones] St Lawrence Church, Valerie Bannister
• Re: Re: [stones] Bradley's Theories, nick
  • Re: Re: [stones] Bradley's Theories, Alligator Descartes
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Re: [stones] Bradley's Theories, nick
• [stones] Sinclairs again, Jezreell
  • Re: [stones] Sinclairs again, Michael Bradley
    • Re: [stones] Sinclairs again, Alligator Descartes
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [stones] Sinclairs again, Jezreell
    • Re: [stones] Sinclairs again, Michael Bradley
      • Re: [stones] Sinclairs again, Alligator Descartes
• [stones] Sinclair again, fao intersted list members, Jezreell
• [stones] Jupiter, Jezreell
• Re: [stones] Esus, Paul Wallis
  • Re: [stones] Esus, Rick
  • Re: [stones] Esus, Andy Norfolk
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [stones] Esus, Paul Wallis
• Re: [stones] moon & star conjunction, Twenty3Cats
• [stones] Peterson, i . hallyburton
  • Re: [stones] Peterson, Alligator Descartes
• [stones] Re: [stones] Peterson, i . hallyburton
  • Re: [stones] Re: [stones] Peterson, Alligator Descartes
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [stones] Re: [stones] Peterson, nick
    • Re: [stones] Re: [stones] Peterson, Alligator Descartes
• [stones] Re: [stones] Peterson, i . hallyburton
• Re: [stones] Peterson, nick
• [stones] Fw: [stonehengepeace] TV or not TV? (23 march), Andy Burnham
  • RE: [stones] Fw: [stonehengepeace] TV or not TV? (23 march), Dingo
    • Re: [stones] Fw: [stonehengepeace] TV or not TV? (23 march), Shaun
• [stones] Talk on Pictish stones in Perthshire, Andy Sweet
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [stones] Talk on Pictish stones in Perthshire, Alligator Descartes
    • Re: [stones] Talk on Pictish stones in Perthshire, Andy Sweet
• [stones] Darren Haynes/POSTOFFICE is out of the office., darren . haynes
• [stones] Murthly identified as an important Pictish site, Andy Sweet
• [stones] may or may not be!, i . hallyburton
  • Re: [stones] may or may not be!, Alligator Descartes
• RE: mast proposed on Patrickstown mountain beside loughcrew, Andy Burnham
• [stones] Devil's Quoits, paulvicky
• RE: Devil's Quoits expedition - 9th March, Andy Burnham
  • RE: Devil's Quoits expedition - 9th March, riotgibbon
    • RE: Devil's Quoits expedition - 9th March, Andy Burnham
• [stones] Devil's Quoits re-erecion, paulvicky